Labour drops policy of nationalisation: Smith echoes Heseltine on industrial strategy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LABOUR'S LAST lingering commitment to nationalisation was quietly dropped yesterday when John Smith published proposals for an industrial strategy seeking maximum consensus with business, unions and
professions.
Contrasting what he saw as a Tory record of damage and neglect with his wish to 'tackle the bias against industry', the Labour leader said: 'Labour means business.'
While Tories attempted to portray Labour's consultative document as a 'rerun of tried and tired policies' that smacked of socialism, many of the proposed options echoed those made by Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, during the late 1980s.
The most significant development, however, was the omission of any trace of Labour's 75-year-old commitment to 'the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange' - Clause IV, Part 4 of the constitution. Instead, Labour would restrict its role to throwing lifelines to 'companies in distress'.
One well-placed party source said the document, Making Britain's Future, flowed naturally from Mr Smith's speech at the Bournemouth local government conference in February, in which he rejected dogma and condemned the debate about ownership as a sterile irrelevance.
'We've stopped discussing public ownership or control because there will be very little left in the public sector by the time of the next election,' the source said.
That did not stop Labour producing its limited commitment on electricity industries to 'restore public control of the National Grid' in last year's election manifesto but was a considerable dilution of Labour's 1983 election pledge to return all privatised assets to public ownership.
Sense of 'deja vu', page 8
Ivor Crewe, page 21
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments