Jury sees James 'abducted' on video
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HE APPEARS as a tiny, lone figure, scarcely discernible amid an everyday scene from a shopping mall. Two-year-old James Bulger had left his mother's side for the last time, at 3.38 and 45 seconds on the afternoon of 12 February.
The jury at the Bulger murder trial yesterday watched 16 minutes of video snapshots recorded, one frame every three seconds, by security cameras at the Strand shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside. Hundreds of figures jerk across the screen, in and out of the shots.
But two figures regularly appear on the film, the jury's attention directed to them by a tiny arrow- shaped cursor. The prosecution at Preston Crown Court alleges they are two 10-year-old boys, wandering the centre until they abduct James, and later murder him.
The next day his mother, Denise, not knowing he was dead, spoke to police as if expecting him back. 'His hair is ready for cutting,' she said in her statement, read to the jury before they watched the edited video recordings. 'He has a full set of baby teeth.'
Mrs Bulger, who was not in court yesterday, could provide only a partial narrative to what the cameras saw. They watched her and James enter a butcher's shop. She said she was served quickly, turned round, and 'he was gone'.
She panicked and began to search for James, but never saw him again. The cameras did. Less than three minutes later he was in the company of two boys. A minute later, the prosecution claims, he is seen with them again, his arm raised trustingly to hold the hand of one of his alleged abductors.
Both the accused boys watched the video recordings, neither showing any emotion; they deny the abduction and murder of James, and the attempted abduction of a second two-year-old boy the same day.
The last frame on the video, the jury was told, shows the boys heading out of the centre with James. Less than six minutes had elapsed since his arrival at the butcher's.
The case continues today.
Mother's frantic search, page 3
Letters, page 19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments