Judges snub Howard on asylum for adulterer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Iranian who says he faces a flogging for committing adultery, or even death at the hands of an outraged husband, if he returned home, had his hopes of obtaining refuge in Britain raised by the Court of Appeal yesterday.
A special adjudicator decided that Jafar Danaei, 29, was "an inveterate lecher" and accepted his account of nights spent with a married woman, whom he had heard was subsequently stoned to death.
Mr Danaei's asylum application was turned down in March last year after the then Home Secretary, Michael Howard, disagreed with the adjudicator, calling the story "a complete fabrication". But yesterday, in a far- reaching judgment defending the independent role of adjudicators, three judges held that Mr Howard had acted unreasonably.
Lord Justice Brown, sitting with Lord Justice Ward and Lord Justice Judge, said Mr Danaei's application for exceptional leave should be reconsidered by the Home Secretary, Jack Straw, warningagainst the dangers of "decision- making by executive or administrative diktat".
The judges refused Home Office lawyers permission to take the case to the House of Lords, but they can still petition the Law Lords direct.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments