Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judges `rob' Lewis of world title

Richard Williams
Sunday 14 March 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THERE WERE calls for Lennox Lewis to be awarded an instant rematch against Evander Holyfield after the fight between the two world heavyweight champions at Madison Square Garden on Saturday night ended in a controversial draw. Lewis, who had waited 10 years for his chance to win the undisputed title, will now have to wait a little longer to rectify what he and his camp see as a serious injustice.

Not many of the 21,284 people packing the Garden thought that the British- born fighter had failed to beat Holyfield on points over 12 rounds. But the dissident minority included one of the three judges, while another felt unable to decide in favour of either man. The split decision left both boxers holding on to their respective titles, but was received with widespread booing in the hall.

Many Americans, including newspaper and television commentators, shared the outrage of the 7,000-strong British contingent. "Robbery!" screamed the front-page headline in the New York Post a few hours later. "Robbed!" agreed the Daily News. "A heist," suggested the New York Times.

Lewis started the fight strongly and held Holyfield at bay during the later stages. "The whole world could see for itself what happened," he said. "This was highway robbery. I call for an automatic rematch next month. But I doubt if he's going to want to fight me again. He looked like an old man in there."

Holyfield, clearly the more bruised and exhausted of the two, admitted his luck, in his own devout fashion. "I go in with God and I come out with God," he said. "Usually the decisions don't go my way. I had a blessed day today, thank the Lord. Lewis really shone. He proved he was tough and that he's good for the game of boxing. In six months, if he wants to get it on, let's get it on. It's no problem with me."

Blame was levelled at the British judge, Larry O'Connell, a Kent engraver who scored the fight even, and at Jean Williams, the US judge, who gave the fight to Holyfield. But there were dark mutterings of the sort that tend to accompany any fight promoted by the flamboyant Don King, to whom a Lewis victory would have meant the end of his grip on the heavyweight division.

Among the more predictably extreme reactions was that of Frank Maloney, Lewis's manager. "If I was Tony Blair," he said, "I'd cut off all diplomatic relations with the United States. It's an absolute con."

Tony Banks, the Sports minister, added: "It was a bad night for boxing. The judging appears to have been bizarre and the result gives rise to the thought that it was more about business than sport. We need a rematch and it should be in this country."

Other boxers were quick to support Lewis. Frank Bruno, the last Briton to fight for the undisputed title, described it as "the most disgusting decision I've ever seen in a boxing ring; Lennox made the fight look easy". Chris Eubank called it "a travesty of justice".

Full story, Sport Section

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in