Judges' remarks to be checked in rape cases
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.COMMENTS made by judges in rape trials are to be monitored by the Government amid fears that sexist attitudes are undermining victims' evidence and allowing rapists to be cleared.
The development follows a threefold increase in the number of reported rapes since 1985. Nearly 18 women report rape attacks every day but the conviction rate has fallen from 24 per cent to 9 per cent in the last three years.
Yesterday, following a report in The Independent highlighting the big increase in reported rape, the Government announced a widespread review of all sex-offence laws.
Home Office minister Alun Michael promised tougher punishments for offenders. "Public protection from sex offenders is of the utmost importance. Our review will ensure that the framework of sexual offences and penalties is coherent and effective," he said.
A Home Office report seen by The Independent reveals that government officials are analysing the way judges handle rape trials.
Women's support groups yesterday called on the Government to remove the discretionary right of judges to allow barristers to cross-examine rape victims on their sexual history.
Lisa Longstaff, of Women Against Rape, said: "Judges routinely allow rape victims to be trashed in court by defence barristers who trawl through the woman's sexual or medical history in order to discredit her."
Eighteen cases a day, page 3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments