Judge hits back at Tory critics of law reforms
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.STEPHEN WARD
Legal Affairs Correspondent
The head of the Government's legal advisers yesterday strongly defended divorce, domestic violence, and right-to-die reforms against criticism by Tory backbenchers.
Alerted by a virulent campaign in the Daily Mail, the MPs have criticised the independent Law Commissioners for what they see as peddling a hidden agenda of liberal values behind the backs of Parliament.
In the the latest phase of the campaign, the Mail attacked proposals from the commissioners in a 250-page report published in March which recommended patients should be able to make "living wills" that instruct doctors that they should not be kept alive if they become mentally incapable, or should be able to appoint a relative or lawyer to decide if they are unable to decide for themselves.
Mr Justice Brooke, a High Court judge coming to the end of his three- year term as chairman of the Law Commissioners, pointed out that every conceivable interested group had been involved in five years of discussions before the report was published in March.
More than 40 groups, including critics, took part in working parties, and more than 100 organisations and experts responded to consultation papers. "Nobody who conceivably might have responded is missing. The idea that it is just pressure groups is rubbish," he said.
The changes proposed were not altering the law, but clarifying it, or giving a simpler remedy where the existing one was too slow or expensive.
However, he welcomed the debate that the Mail had provoked. "These are difficult issues. As long as the public debate is well-informed, or even if it is not, this is what freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, is all about."
The Lord Chancellor, the Home Secretary, the Health Secretary, the Social Security Secretary, and officials from their departments have all been involved in the discussions. There is also likely to be a period of public consultation.
Lady Olga Maitland, the Tory MP who helped force changes last week to the Family Homes and Domestic Violence Bill, renewed her attack yesterday on the divorce proposals.
"The Law Commission are living in another world. The more we learn about what they are proposing, the more I realise we should not allow boffins to dictate our lives. Bravo to them for putting forward ideas, but my goodness, it does not mean we are obliged to accept them. I think they are living on another planet," she said.
News analysis, page 21
Leading Article, page 22
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments