Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge backs spy base protesters

John Davison
Wednesday 14 July 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WOMEN PEACE protesters in Yorkshire won a partial victory in the High Court yesterday after a judge ruled that they could keep a caravan outside the US spy base at Menwith Hill, near Harrogate, so long as they remove it every night.

The women were contesting an order by North Yorkshire County Council to clear the site, in a lay-by near the base, in a legal action that has been going on for more than 18 months.

But Mr Justice Hooper, sitting in Leeds, ruled that the caravan came under the same highway regulations as a nearby mobile cafe.

The caravan was the last permanent peace camp in the country, born out of a tradition going back to Greenham Common in the early 1980s. It has been in place since 1993, but a further nine caravans were removed in November last year after earlier court rulings.

Protest leaders had previously pledged to remain on the site whatever the court ruled, even to the point of breaking the law. One woman involved in a separate protest at the base was imprisoned earlier this year for defying a court order banning her from the site.

The Menwith Hill Women's Peace Camp claims that the council was pressured into taking action against it by the Ministry of Defence, which was worried about the attention the camp was drawing to the base's activities. Documents released during the case confirm this, the protesters say.

Last year the women caused a row in the European Parliament over claims that Menwith Hill, run by the American National Security Agency on a lease from the Ministry of Defence, was dealing in commercial espionage as well as military monitoring. Security experts in Germany estimate that their country loses at least pounds 7bn a year in industrial secrets stolen as a result of commercial espionage.

Helen John, 61, who moved to the area to set up the protest camp, said that she was pleased but surprised by the court ruling. "The fact that we have been given a right to remain and protest means that we have the right to ask those in elected positions to go a lot further forward in trying to find out what is actually happening within that base," she said.

Menwith Hill already has 27 "golf ball" surveillance units, and a further two are due to be built in the near future. It has been claimed that the expansion will be part of the United States' Space Based Infra Red System, a version of "Star Wars" technology which would also have the ability to target satellites in space. This has been denied by the Ministry of Defence.

This capacity, together with the base's role in nuclear capability and a worldwide surveillance network, are the targets of the protesters. In modern warfare it is women and children who suffer disproportionately, they say.

North Yorkshire County Council yesterday welcomed the judge's decision on the grounds that it meant that the current, permanent caravan would have to be removed.

Alan Burns, the council's maintenance manager, said: "It is a balanced and sensible judgment which not only recognises the county council's role as highways authority, but also the right of protest - something which we have never tried to stop."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in