Japan in war museum row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CONTROVERSY surrounded the opening of a Japanese war museum that commemorates the hardship of civilians during and after the Second World War but which makes no mention of the cause of the war, or of Japanese atrocities.
Construction of the country's first national museum dedicated to the Second World War has stirred a debate over its message, pitting conservative nationalists against liberals who want Japan to face up to the past.
The Japan War-Bereaved Families Association and nationalist groups wanted the museum to reflect patriotic themes and to stress the sacrifice made by Japanese soldiers, but historians called for it to incorporate evidence of Japan's wartime aggression and brutality. In 1996 the government decided it would simply focus on the experience of the survivors, so it skips such topics as the attack on Pearl Harbor, the sexual enslavement of women in conquered countries such as China and Korea and biological experiments on live human captives.
Japan's neighbours have urged it to be more forthcoming about atrocities but the subject is still largely considered taboo. While Tokyo has expressed varying degrees of "remorse", increasingly vocal revisionists say it has nothing to apologise for.
The project attracted attention because its projected construction cost was funded by the Health and Welfare Ministry under benefits administered to families of Japanese veterans.
The site has also caused controversy, as it is located in the centre of Tokyo, next to a shrine for the country's 2.5 million war dead, including executed war criminals. (Reuters)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments