Insurers count cost of Easter floods
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PEOPLE living in the Midlands and East Anglia breathed a sigh of relief yesterday as river experts announced that the flooding is almost certainly over.
A spokesman for the Environment Agency said: "The great floods of 1947 were the worst in living memory. That level of flood happens about once a century. But what we have seen over the weekend should be the sort of thing that happens only once in 150 years."
He added: "We are cautiously optimistic that the worst is now over. But river levels will remain high for the next 48 hours and it will take some days to get back to normality."
Owners of homes and businesses in towns including Leamington Spa and Stratford-upon- Avon in Warwickshire, Evesham in Worcestershire, Northampton and Bedford, continued the mop-up operation yesterday.
Peterborough was the last major centre of population to feel the force of the flood, but the Environment Agency said that the city had not suffered as badly as it had feared. Though further flooding is unlikely, the unseasonable weather is set to continue, with the prospect of more snow today in some regions.
Insurers said that they would be able to pay out an estimated pounds 400m damages bill without any dramatic knock-on effect on the cost of premiums, dismissing claims that premiums could soar by up to 35 per cent to meet the massive losses.
Jeffery Salmon, chairman of Salmon Assessors, an insurance claim negotiator, claimed that the final bill for the flooding could be greater than the pounds 1.2bn paid out after the 1987 hurricane: "We believe it's going to be somewhere between pounds 1.2bn and pounds 1.5bn," he said.
But the Association of British Insurers (ABI) described these estimates as "absolute rubbish". Tony Baker, the ABI's deputy director, said: "It is not that big an event for the insurance industry to be faced with a bill for pounds 300-500m ... Money is set aside. That's what the industry is here for. There will be no significant effect on premiums."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments