Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Inhibitions cast aside as Church faces the future

General Synod: The absence of burning issues to debate gives proceeding s a taint of irrelevance. Andrew Brown reports

Andrew Brown
Sunday 09 July 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When the Church of England's General Synod meets on the campus of York University, you would never guess that this was the only body in England outside Parliament capable of making laws.

It might well be an Open University summer school: a sprinkling of dons amid a lot of earnest middle-aged seekers after truth all gossiping over paper cups of mud-coloured instant coffee.

There are thin men in open-necked shirts and fat men in unsuitable T- shirts, unless they are fat bishops, in which case their T-shirts are purple and dignified.

One of the thinner and grander bishops was sitting over a cold self-service buffet (pie, cottage cheese, rollmop herrings) on the benches of the university dining halls yesterday. At home he lives in a palace and rather enjoys it.

But he knows this style is on the way out.

"When I grew up, it was usual for the rector to have gone to the same public schools as the people who owned the village," he said.

He continued: "I grew up in an old fashioned rectory, with servants and a gardener, and a tennis court. It was usual to see people playing tennis in white flannels, with the trousers held up by a college tie; and, if it were hot, to wear a panama hat, even at the net."

Here the bishop mimed a gentle back-hand volley at the net and smiled at the memory. "Nowadays," he continued, "the people in the countryside with money are quite different, and our people feel much shyer about addressing them.

All the large rectories, the glebe barns and so on, now belong to businessmen and never to clergy."

He thought for a moment, and added: "I don't have any inhibitions about going to a house like that. I just tell myself it's where you get the best gin and tonics."

But bishops with the confidence to ask for their gin and tonics grow fewer every year. It is difficult to imagine any of the present crowd responding as Mervyn Stockwood, the retired Bishop of Southwark, did when told he was about to be outed last year. "Tell 'em I've had a lot of women too," he replied.

One of the most confused men at synod is Patrice de Beer, the correspondent of Le Monde. He has come here to learn something about Englishness - this is, after all, the established Church.

And yet in Private Members' Questions it emerges that the General Synod asked Parliament to allow Anglican priests to stand for election to the House of Commons 12 years ago, and Parliament has still not found the time to discuss this.

The only trace of pomp to be seen is an embossed letter from the Queen, stuck to a plain brick wall, which charges the Archbishops to dissolve the convocations for elections this autumn.

At these elections there will be no great single issue like the ordination of women at these elections.

There are no party divisions about how to cope with the Church's financial crisis.

The only real battle will be over the recognition of homosexual relationships and priests. It really is difficult to believe that this slightly sun- struck gathering is an essential part of the British Constitution.

Will anyone even notice if it is disestablished?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in