Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'I like what you say, so I'll say the same'

Saturday 21 June 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The politics may be diverging, but the language is almost identical, writes Stephen Castle. Alan Duncan, William Hague's campaign manager, gave it away when he chose one of Peter Mandelson's favourite terms to describe the Tories' task in rebuilding their party. It was, he said, "the project". Nor was this an isolated instance. Labour politicians were struck by the use of language and the themes which Mr Hague used in his speech accepting the leadership, made in Conservative Central Office on Thursday evening. There are many elements in common with Tony Blair's leadership statement, "Change and National Renewal", and his acceptance speech at the Institute of Education made in July 1994.

For one, there was the emphasis on rebuilding the party machinery, which Mr Hague said on Thursday must become the "most potent political machine in this country". He added: "Be prepared for some changes in this party because the way we conduct ourselves is going to change." Change was a buzz word for Mr Blair in his acceptance speech: "Look at how we have changed." Mr Blair's leadership statement spelled out a similar message that "A healthy party organisation is the starting point for electoral success. Without a radical and vibrant party, there will be no radical and vibrant government."

Both political leaders saw the basis of this in increased party membership. Mr Hague called for the membership to double, joking that half the increase should be made up of members younger than the 36-year-old leader. Mr Blair, who also had called for a doubling of Labour membership, said in his leadership statement: "We must use this opportunity to recruit many more thousands of members. More members mean more activists and more activity - more people not just to be involved in local parties but to serve their communities."

Both men stressed the need to look forward, not backwards. Mr Hague said on Thursday: "Let's look forward, not back. Let's pick ourselves up, dust ourselves down and return to the future." In 1994 Mr Blair said: "For our generation and our time, Labour must exist not only to defend the gains of the past, but to forge a new future." From Mr Hague there was also the familiar Blairite emphasis on hard decisions and tough choices which needed to be made: "If I have to, I will put some noses out of joint. If I have to, I will make myself unpopular for a time."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in