Hurd concedes breach over dam
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A largely unrepentant Douglas Hurd yesterday conceded he broke overseas aid rules over the Pergau dam when he told the Commons that he would not appeal against last month's High Court ruling that government funding of the project was illegal.
But the Foreign Secretary insisted that funding for this and three other legally doubtful "aid for trade" projects would continue to be met from Treasury reserves.
The move, which brought an angry response from the Opposition, leaves the Overseas Development Agency's budget in debt for the years 1996 to 2003 to the tune of about £122m.
Labour MPs repeatedly called for Mr Hurd's resignation despite a promise that the aid budget would be boosted for the next two years to the extent of the £65.5m which would now be taken from the reserves to fund Pergau and the three further projects. These are a British sub-contract for the Metro in Ankara, worth £22m; a £2.3m project to build a television studio in Indonesia; and the £29m Botswana Light Information Region project.
Mr Hurd's admission that to be legally safe they would have to be funded from reserves indicates a strong risk that, applying last month's ruling, they would be adjudged economically unsound and of little benefit to the countries concerned or their people.
That disclosure is embarrassing enough, but Labour MPs were further angered by Mr Hurd's refusal to "open the books" in respect of illegal spending on the four projects in previous years.
"What is self-evident to the taxpayer is that money was misused," Sir David Steel, the Liberal Democrat elder statesman, said. Joan Lestor, shadow overseas development minister, said the Pergau loan was untenable - and so was Mr Hurd's position.
Inside Parliament, page 8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments