Howard hits back at Taylor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HEATHER MILLS
Home Affairs Correspondent
The Prime Minister yesterday leapt to the defence of his Home Secretary who is facing an unprecedented attack from the country's leading judges over his criminal justice programme.
John Major told the Commons the Government's aim was to "protect the public from dangerous criminals".
He was forced to his feet in the Commons following accusations from Lord Taylor, the Lord Chief Justice, and Britain most senior judge, that the government was unleashing a torrent of hasty and flawed legislation, which was in danger of undermining public confidence in the system.
In particular he told Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, that his plans for mandatory life sentences for repeat rapists and violent offenders and stiff penalties for persistent burglars and drug dealers, would do nothing to deter crime.
Mr Howard, who on Wednesday had sought to diffuse the situation by remaining silent, admitted there were "differences" between himself and Lord Taylor.
He said: "Lord Taylor apparently believes it is acceptable for these serious offenders to continue to be released without any assessment being made of their risk to the public, even if everybody knows that there is a risk that they will go out and commit a third rape or a third murder."
He told the BBC: "I'm sure he doesn't want those people to be released but that is what actually happens now; 90 per cent of those people are released even if everybody knows they are still a risk to the public. I want to remedy that."
News analysis, page 15
At War over the Law, page 17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments