Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Howard angry over jail watchdog

Heather Mills Home Affairs Correspondent
Sunday 23 October 1994 20:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Home Office ministers have again been accused of political interference with appointments to the new independent body set up to investigate prisoners' grievances.

Having taken the highly unusual step of vetoing all candidates shortlisted for the post of the first-ever prison ombudsman because they were considered 'too left-wing', Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, is now unhappy with the credentials of the man appointed as one of his key assistants. Sir Peter Woodhead, the ombudsman finally approved by ministers and due to start work today, has appointed Adam Sampson, the former deputy director of the high-profile pressure group the Prison Reform Trust. Ministers apparently considered terminating Mr Sampson's contract before it even started, but instead Mr Howard and Michael Forsyth, the prisons minister, castigated Brian Caffery, the head of Home Office personnel, over the appointment.

Last year Mr Howard was accused of seeking a Tory 'placeman' for the sensitive prison post after he rejected all three well-qualified candidates shortlisted for the job by the Civil Service Commission. One of them was Stephen Shaw, Mr Sampson's boss at the Prison Reform Trust.

Harry Fletcher, of the National Association of Probation Officers, said: 'The prison ombudsman must be seen to be scrupulously independent to maintain his credibility.' Ministers are wary of the role of ombudsman, because, like that of Judge Stephen Tumim, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, he can cause the Government grave embarrassment. In other countries, such as the US, Canada, and Sweden, ombudsmen have considerable impact in promoting penal reform.

It was after a firm of private headhunters was called in to find candidates that Sir Peter, the retired Nato Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic, was selected as ombudsman last April. Home Office sources suggest he is already proving a little more liberal and independent than the Home Secretary anticipated. Yesterday Sir Peter said: 'The Home Secretary has said nothing to me personally about Adam Sampson's appointment. He was chosen by a Home Office board on his merits and his appointment has given us a better balance.'

A Home Office spokesman last night said the position of ombudsman was referred to ministers. The spokesman refused to comment on claims that Mr Caffery had been castigated or that ministers were unhappy with Mr Sampson's appointment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in