Holiday sunscreen 'costs pounds 313'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A family of four could spend pounds 313.74 on sunscreen protection during a two-week holiday, Labour claimed yesterday
And the party's spokesman on consumer affairs, Nigel Griffiths, protested that because of the "high price" of these products and "confusing information" on labels, many Britons were being put at risk of potentially deadly skin cancers.
Mr Griffiths said the Consumers' Association, the Cancer Research Campaign and the Imperial Cancer Research Fund were now calling for action to clarify how sunscreen should be used to protect against skin cancer.
Calculations by Labour's Consumer Policy Unit have disclosed, he said, that a family of four could have to pay up to pounds 313.74 for sunscreen coverage over a two-week holiday.
"Considering the high price, it is no wonder that 46 per cent of sunbathers do not use sunscreen at all," Mr Griffiths said.
He added that the calculation was based on market research conducted by the CA. This showed that the top 25 per cent of recommended sunscreens cost an average of pounds 2.49 per adult application. For a family of four, including two young children, this would equal pounds 7.47 per application. Applied three times a day over two weeks (42 applications), the sunscreen would cost pounds 313.74.
Mr Griffiths said: "It should be the duty of manufacturers to clearly label their product and protect consumers from the pain of sunburn and the threat of cancer. It is clear the public are confused and the manufacturers have not acted to resolve the problems."
"It is absurd that so many people pay so much and yet have to learn the hard way how unprotective their sunscreen is."
He added: "Labelling has to be clearer and manufacturers should make the product available at prices people can afford."
Mr Griffiths said that 40,000 Britons were diagnosed with skin cancer and that 2,000 deaths were attributed to it each year.
"In Scotland, where cases of melanoma, the most dangerous of skin cancers, have risen by a staggering 240 per cent in 20 years, the dangers of misleading labelling of sunscreens are even more real," he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments