HMSO accounts showed lack of proper procedure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The National Audit Office yesterday highlighted a lack of financial control over the accounts of Her Majesty's Stationery Office prior to its privatisation last year, and qualified the figures because of poor procedure.
HMSO was sold in September, but prior to that it had been divided up into 14 business units. While the units were responsible for their own invoicing, payments were made to HMSO's central bank account, and therefore it was difficult to reconcile payments with invoices. As a result, pounds 1.6m is being held in a temporary account because it has not been matched to particular debtors.
The Comptroller General, Sir John Bourn, also qualified the accounts because of "an unresolved net imbalance of pounds 482,000" on trading between HMSO's business units. He said: "there was no effective system of control over the accounting of for these inter-business transactions."
The terms of the sale, which raised pounds 54m, are the subject of a separate NAO inquiry. The NAO points out that a number of outstanding claims against HMSO were transferred to the Cabinet Office before the sale went through, including one for pounds 3.7m by Siba Systems Ltd, over an alleged breach of public procurement rules, but this was subsequently dropped.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments