Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hillary speech avoids state of union

Glenda Cooper
Wednesday 02 September 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SHE FLEW into Belfast, one of the most powerful women in the world, ready to speak out for women's rights and their key role in the Irish peace process. It didn't matter - all everyone wanted to know was whether she was still furious with her philandering husband.

Yesterday the First Lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton, was addressing the Vital Voices - Women in Democracy conference. But thanks to Mr Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, the former White House intern, any words of wisdom Hillary Clinton said were subsumed into feverish speculation about the State of the Union - the Clintons' union that is.

Onlookers wanted to know whether the big chill between Hillary and her husband was ongoing or whether the trip to Moscow had gone some way to thawing the cold war as she gave her first public speech since her husband's confession. The speculation was even more intense because Hillary was said to have been working on this speech in the White House when her husband was two floors below testifying to Kenneth Starr about his "inappropriate relationship" with the intern.

When things look bad, Mrs Clinton has always slapped on the warpaint, put on her best clothes and fought back with her "don't-dare-feel-sorry- for-me" attitude.

Still, for a feminist the fact that her appearance (navy blue suit), her gestures (minimal), and even her lipstick (very discreet) would be considered more important than the message she was trying to get across about women's role in the peace process must have been frustrating.

What the First Lady actually said in her speech was to reiterate the US's firm stance on terrorism and its support for the peace process, pay tribute to the "courage and strength of generations of women" who had contributed to change in the political climate (she particularly praised Mo Mowlam's role, including her talents as a dancer). But no one was listening. Rather everyone wanted to know if she winced as she said the words "my husband" (she did not refer to him by any other name).

Certainly the 500 British and 75 American women at the Waterfront Hall gave her an enthusiastic welcome. But despite her stirring words, live TV coverage of her speech was abruptly pulled after 10 minutes. After all, she hadn't said anything about Monica.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in