NHS and private hospitals told to improve after patient death
Investigators warn safety gaps between NHS and private sector ‘can be devastating’ for patients
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The NHS and private hospitals need to improve how they work together after the death of an NHS patient treated privately during the pandemic, a watchdog has warned.
An investigation by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch found some private hospitals took on more complex patients than they were used to, while problems with communication and confusion over responsibilities created safety risks.
It has called on the Care Quality Commission to do more to inspect how the two sectors work together and how patients are transferred between hospitals safely.
It launched an inquiry after the death of a patient, known as Rodney, aged 58, who was due to have keyhole surgery to remove part of his bowel due to cancer.
His NHS operation was cancelled and rebooked at a nearby private hospital after cancer services were transferred to the independent hospital due to Covid-19.
Rodney was asked to sign a consent form for open bowel surgery, rather than the less invasive keyhole procedure, due to guidance at the time around a "potentially increased risk of Covid-19 transmission with laparoscopic surgery", the HSIB said.
The cancerous part of his bowel was removed but eight days later his condition he deteriorated rapidly and was transferred to the local hospital so he could receive intensive care - which was not available at the private hospital.
When he arrived at the NHS hospital, a scan and more surgery showed a leak in his bowel which led to sepsis and organ failure. He died later that day.
As a result of the case, the HSIB launched a wider investigation into NHS surgical services being carried out in independent hospitals.
It found the capability and capacity of independent hospitals to provide surgical care varied across the country.
It said national and local NHS organisations had a "limited understanding" of independent hospitals' capabilities which resulted in variation in how independent hospitals were used during Covid-19.
The investigation also identified safety risks associated with the assessment of patients prior to surgery, but the HSIB said these could be reduced with "successful collaboration between the NHS and the independent sector".
Kathryn Whitehill, principal national investigator, said: " The reference case we examined and the national investigation findings highlight that, if there are any gaps in the surgical care pathway, the impact can be devastating on patients, families and healthcare staff.
“NHS patients are being cared for in the independent health sector now more than ever before.
"The health service continues to deal with the repercussions of the pandemic and the services and pathways that have been implemented between the NHS and the independent sector are likely to continue in response to these ongoing pressures.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments