Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

NHS finances in 'perilous state', says damning Public Accounts Committee report

'Rescue packages are no substitute for a coherent, properly funded strategy,' says chair

Harriet Agerholm
Monday 26 March 2018 19:05 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NHS finances are in a “perilous state” and desperately need a long-term solution, a damning report by in influential group of MPs has found.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) accused the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England of being “too focused on propping up the system” and neglecting to plan ahead.

“The National Health Service continues to scrape by on emergency handouts and funds that were intended for essential investment,” PAC chair Meg Hillier said.

“We have said it before and we will say it again: rescue packages and budget transfers are no substitute for a coherent, properly funded strategy that enables NHS trusts to plan, focus on patient care and lay the groundwork for long-term financial sustainability.”

The committee cited last winter’s NHS crisis as evidence of the Government’s short-term approach, since despite early warnings of a looming healthcare emergency, Chancellor Philip Hammond waited until November to announce additional funding.

“The Government’s last-minute response to what were entirely predictable winter pressures is just the latest vivid demonstration of why fresh thinking is so desperately needed,” Ms Hillier said.

The committee called for the DHSC to produce detailed plans on the future of the NHS by July, saying it was “disappointed” its previous warnings to the Government about its short-term approach had gone ignored.

Securing a funding settlement from the Treasury that properly reflected current and anticipated demand for the NHS was a key part of such a plan, it said.

NHS trusts forecast a deficit of over £900m in 2017/18, meaning the NHS “has a long way to go before it is financially sustainable”, the committee found.

The PAC's warning came amid growing calls from MPs to increase funding for healthcare, with some suggesting a ring-fenced “NHS tax”.

Appearing on ITV's Peston on Sunday, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt admitted tax rises may be needed to boost NHS funding, criticising the “crazy” funding plan of the NHS that lurched from “feast to famine”.

Mr Hunt also said speculation in The Sunday Times about a £4bn-a-year funding injection to coincide with the NHS’s 70th birthday was premature.

The head of NHS England, Simon Stevens, refused to say whether the health service had been promised the extra money at a PAC meeting on Monday, but said: “The sort of figures you are talking about is consistent with funding growth.”

He said he would welcome a five- or 10-year funding plan to improve the efficiency of the service, adding it was “a case for debate” whether recently announced pay rises for NHS staff would continue beyond 2022.

In its report, the committee said it welcomed the decision to lift the 1 per cent pay cap for staff, but it “will be watching” to see if it led to more staff saying in the service. “We need to be clear this is not robbing Peter to pay Paul,” the committee added.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in