GPs threaten to strike over plans to make them work Saturdays and evenings
New NHS contract means doctors must offer appointments from 9am to 5pm on Saturdays, as well as until 8pm on weekdays
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GPs have threatened to strike over a contract that would force them to offer appointments at evenings and weekends.
While GPs would be unlikely to stop providing emergency and urgent care during industrial action, they could refuse to carry out other routine work and could cut their hours.
In March, NHS England announced changes to the 2022/23 GP contract, saying doctors needed to make at least 25 percent of appointments available for online booking while also extending opening hours.
The changes mean GPs need to offer appointments from 9am to 5pm on Saturdays, as well as until 8pm on weekdays.
For a strike to go ahead a new ballot would be needed for industrial action to happen, with more than 50 percent of eligible GP members voting in favour.
Medics at the British Medical Association (BMA) annual conference in Brighton called on BMA leaders to act upon a 2021 indicative ballot and “organise opposition” to the contract, “including industrial action if necessary”.
We can't trust this Government to protect general practice or indeed the wider NHS
The BMA criticised the new contract and said NHS England had refused to offer practices reimbursement to cover additional costs.
The union’s call for flexibility for Primary Care Networks (PCNs) to “hire the professionals they need based on the needs of their patients” was also turned down. Instead they are bound by “rigid, prescriptive job roles”.
BMA members already voted in favour of industrial action last November in an indicative ballot.
Each of the 5,144 GP practices in England where a partner is a BMA member had a vote but there was low turnout, with only 35 percent taking part.
Most GPs who voted then did, however, back withholding information about how they give appointments in light of a government plan to “name and shame” practices that see too few patients face to face.
I know some of you will be worried about industrial action but how much more can we take?
At the BMA Brighton meeting on Tuesday, the part of the motion relating to industrial action was passed by 57 percent in favour to 17 percent against, while 26 percent abstained.
Other parts of the motion were also passed – calling on the BMA to organise withdrawal of GP practices from PCNs by 2023 (61 percent voted in favour).
Medics also voted by 64 percent in favour of PCN funding to be moved into the GP core contract.
PCNs involve groups of GP practices working with community, mental health, social care, pharmacy, hospital and voluntary services in their local areas.
Some GPs see them as diluting the quality of patient care and argue they are a “Trojan horse” for undermining general practice. They argue the money could instead form part of the core GP contract.
They (the Government) want to create mistrust amongst our patients and destroy that unique relationship
Dr Jackie Applebee, a GP from Tower Hamlets in London, who proposed the overall motion, said there was a need to protect the existing contract from “vultures” and PCNs should be “abolished along with all the box-ticking”.
She said: “We can’t trust this government to protect general practice or indeed the wider NHS. They’ve been in power for 12 years but things are only getting worse.”
To cheers and applause, she said GPs should of course be held accountable for any shift in funding and “should not be able to pare services back to the minimum so that we can pop into the local Porsche showroom”.
She added: “I know some of you will be worried about industrial action but how much more can we take?
“We should take our lead from the RMT – they have quite rightly said ‘enough is enough, no more pay erosion, no more safety cuts’.”
She said “solidarity to them” and urged medics to channel their “inner Mick Lynch” (RMT leader).
Speaking against the motion, Dr Kieran Sharrock, one of the negotiators for the BMA’s GPs’ committee, urged members not to put the BMA in a “straitjacket” with its decision.
But Dr Reshma Syed, a GP partner from Kent, spoke in favour, saying: “Make no mistake, GPs are fighting a war for their very existence.
“Primary Care Network was a Trojan horse brought in by the government, a ploy to designed to mislead us, remove funding from core general practice and divert our attention away from quality patient care.
“PCN is only the start of the dismemberment of general practice, piece by piece.
“They work to destroy the [General Medical Services] contract and independent contract status as we know it.
“They want to create mistrust amongst our patients and destroy that unique relationship.
“They want to invest in every other allied health professional and not in the GP … Why? Because they are hell-bent on the privatisation of the NHS through the back door.”