Christian TV channel breached broadcasting rules with Covid conspiracy theories, Ofcom rules
Watchdog says channel spread ‘potentially harmful’ claims about pandemic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Christian satellite television channel has been found to have breached broadcasting rules by airing unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about coronavirus, Ofcom has ruled.
The broadcasting watchdog said the channel had presented sermons with “potentially harmful” claims about Covid-19 during a 29-hour programme titled The Global Day Of Prayer.
It added that the programme contained unsubstantiated claims that the pandemic was “planned” and created by the “deep state”, and false suggestions that vaccines were a means of administering “nanochips” to control and harm people.
It is the second time in a year that Ofcom has ruled against the channel for statements made about the pandemic on its programmes.
Loveworld also falsely claimed that the cause of coronavirus was linked to the rollout of 5G technology - a conspiracy theory which has been widely-discredited by experts.
“Ofcom stresses that legitimate debate about the official response to the coronavirus pandemic is fundamental to holding public authorities to account during a global health crisis - particularly when public freedoms are curtailed and complex policy decisions are taken,” the watchdog said in a statement.
“However, the potentially harmful claims made during the programme were unsupported by any factual evidence and went entirely without challenge."
It added: “Loveworld's failure to put these unsubstantiated statements into context risked serious harm to its audience.
“They had the potential to undermine confidence in public health measures put in place to tackle Covid-19, at a time when cases, hospital admissions and deaths were rising in the UK.”
Ofcom has previously said that broadcasters have the “editorial freedom to analyse, discuss and challenge issues relating to the coronavirus”.
However, in instances where potentially harmful material is shown, it warned that broadcasters must ensure that “adequate protection” for their audience is provided.
Such harmful material could include: health claims related to the virus which may be harmful, medical advice which may be harmful, and misleading material in relation to the pandemic.
Ofcom has directed Loveworld not to repeat the programme, which was aired in December, and to broadcast a statement of their findings on a date and in a form to be determined by the watchdog.
Loveworld did not immediately respond to a request for comment by the PA news agency.
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments