Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hospital which failed to save six-month-old baby criticised by health ombudsman

James Paget University Hospitals Foundation Trust was not ‘open and accountable’ says health ombudsman

Shaun Lintern
Health Correspondent
Wednesday 18 December 2019 02:46 EST
Comments
Doctors failed to correctly diagnose Harris’ heart defect
Doctors failed to correctly diagnose Harris’ heart defect

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hospital trust that failed to spot a fatal heart defect in a six-month-old baby has been ordered to pay £15,000 to his family.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has criticised James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for serious failings in its care of Harris James, after staff missed multiple opportunities to save his life.

The ombudsman, the final arbiter in patient complaints against the NHS, also criticised the trust’s handling of its investigation into Harris’ death, saying it “was not open and accountable” and “failed to acknowledge and apologise for its mistakes in a timely manner”.

Staff also delayed telling his parents, Mary Gunns and Ryan James, that they could complain to the ombudsman.

In a statement, the parents said: “Our son was an affectionate and sweet little boy whose sudden death devastated our family.

“We won’t ever be able to forgive James Paget Hospital for its failings, nor will we forget the additional pain caused by its mishandling of our complaint.

“We hope that, following the ombudsman’s recommendations, the trust takes action to make sure this never happens again.”

In November 2015, Harris was referred to the hospital after a bout of gastroenteritis and weight loss. The GP noted his stomach was drawn inwards but this was not recorded by the trust.

Staff carried out blood and urine tests and an appointment in a month’s time was made with a dietitian. Just over a week later, Harris was taken by ambulance to the emergency department after he vomited and became limp.

A chest X-ray showed part of his lungs had filled with fluid and an electrocardiogram (ECG) showed abnormalities in his heart.

Doctors suspected pneumonia and gave him oxygen, antibiotics and fluids, but staff failed to ask a specialist about Harris’ heart abnormalities.

He was not seen by a consultant until the next morning, even though his condition was deteriorating. He later suffered a heart attack and died.

The ombudsman found the trust failed to correctly diagnose Harris’ heart defect, despite the fact that his medical history, symptoms, and poor response to treatment for pneumonia were clear signs something else was wrong.

The trust has formally apologised to his family and agreed to pay £15,000 in recognition of the injustice its failings caused.

Ombudsman Rob Behrens said: “This tragic case shows how important it is that people speak up when mistakes are made.

“It is crucial that the trust learns from its failures to make sure they are not repeated.”

Anna Hills, chief executive at James Paget University Hospitals Foundation Trust, said: “We have apologised to Harris’ family for the failings in his clinical care – and for the manner in which we communicated with them and handled their complaint when they raised concerns after his death.

“We have now implemented changes to ensure that, in the future, action is taken to ensure appropriate clinical escalation in similar situations and also that bereaved parents and relatives are treated with the compassion, sensitivity and respect they deserve.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in