Health service: Trust mergers may backfire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One in six NHS trusts are involved in merger talks with neighbouring trusts but the savings achieved are likely to be overwhelmed by damage to staff morale and opposition from politicians and public, according to a survey.
Even if a third of all trusts merge, twice the number currently considering the move, the savings would be pounds 240m at most, according to the survey conducted jointly by the Health Service Journal and Nexus Structured Communications. Frank Dobson, Secretary of State for Health, has said he expects to see more mergers to reduce duplication of facilities, and provide a more efficient service. But the survey found opposition from nearly every group, both inside and outside trusts. Geoffrey Bowden, author of the report, said: "The savings are extremely modest for the pain and agony that they will put the NHS through."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments