Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Health chiefs 'waste millions'

Susan Emmett
Thursday 10 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Health authorities in England and Wales are wasting millions of pounds because of bad book-keeping, according to a survey published yesterday.

Research into the purchasing patterns of seven unnamed health authorities found that pounds 651.9m is being wasted through ignorance about which services authorities buy and what they spend.

The study, by the Anti-Rationing group, a think tank and research body, was prompted by the rationing of leukaemia treatment for 11-year-old Jamie Bowen - Child B - by the Cambridge and Huntingdon health authority.

The report examines what health authorities were paying for 40 different services and found a general pattern of inappropriate spending and massive overspending.

The findings, published in the Health Service Journal, show that health authorities knew how much money they had spent on emergency services such as casualty, surgical emergency and maternity only 65 per cent of the time.

They could also only identify 66 per cent of spending on non-acute services such as care for the elderly and mentally ill. And only 69 per cent of spending on community care services such as psychiatric nursing, drug abuse and occupational therapy could be pinpointed.

One of the health authorities investigated was unable to supply any cost break down at all.

The problem arises because of the usual practice of block buying, in which a range of services are bought in a single package. This does not allow health authorities to distinguish between the services and allocate money accordingly, says the anti-rationing group.

The report says millions are being mis-spent on buying services which are not yet proven to be effective, blind buying and overpaying on certain services.

A Department of Health spokesman said: "If anyone has evident of conspicuous waste, it should be put to the health authority concerned and the National Health Executive."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in