Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Head of failing school signs up as inspector

Lucy Ward,Education Correspondent
Monday 04 August 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The headteacher of a Cambridge primary school which was found to be failing despite educating the children of university academics is to inspect other schools after stepping down from his post.

Martin Lown, who leaves Newnham Croft Primary at the end of this month after 10 years at the school, passed a training course run by the inspection agency Ofsted and will join teams inspecting primary schools next term.

Parents at Newnham Croft, who include a number of Cambridge University tutors and lecturers, were shocked when a highly critical Ofsted inspection report published in March found that the school was failing to provide its pupils with an acceptable standard of education.

Although pupils were often matching national expectations for their age group, their work in class was not reflecting their full capabilities, inspectors found. Although reception classes gave children a good start, the atmosphere in classrooms higher up the school did not enable pupils to learn properly.

In infant classes, no work at all was of a high standard, inspectors found. They wrote in their report: "Hardly any work is in line with the expected standard for their age, although pupils' talk indicated that they are articulate and quick on the uptake. Writing and number work is careless and meagre in quality."

Inspectors recommended that the school should improve curriculum planning to ensure all subjects were covered and set out clear goals for each lesson. Some parents had accused the school of refusing to listen to their complaints that their children were progressing too slowly.

As a team inspector, who joined the Ofsted register three years ago, Mr Lown has signed signed up with agencies who bid for contracts from Ofsted to inspect primary schools.

To be accepted as a team inspector, teachers or heads have to demonstrate that they have sufficient experience of their subject area or of management of schools, and must provide references. If considered suitably qualified, they must undergo five days of training spread out over up to eight weeks - a process described as rigorous by Ofsted.

Mr Lown said that Newnham Croft had been through a number of "crises and difficulties, most of which were beyond my control". He had told inspection agencies of the situation and all had told him they were happy to accept him, he said. Only the agency which had sent the team to his own school had declined to add his name to its books, "by mutual agreement".

Since the Newnham Croft inspection, the Chief Inspector of Schools, Chris Woodhead, has continued to stress Ofsted's focus on teaching quality and particularly on standards in numeracy and literacy.

However, Mr Woodhead acknowledged last week at a teachers' conference that the service needed to remedy some weaknesses among team inspectors. Some needed more training to ensure that they were qualified to inspect a variety of subjects, while others had been "inhumane" in denying teachers feedback after classroom observation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in