Head fails to ban intruders from school
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Laws protecting schools from intruders were condemned as inadequate by an angry headteacher yesterday after he failed to get an interim injunction to ban a group of teenagers from his school.
John Gribble, headteacher of Bretton Woods Community School, in Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, was told by a county court judge that any injunction which he granted would not be enforceable.
"The court's decision illustrates the inadequacy of current legislative arrangements for the protection of schools from intrusion," said Mr Gribble, two of whose pupils have been threatened or attacked in the past three weeks.
He said that he remained "determined to deal with those mischief-makers who seek to disrupt our school" and that he would be demanding a tightening up of the law to deal with the problem.
The controversy at Bretton Woods comes as the murder of the headteacher Philip Lawrence in London last Friday has heightened concerns about school security.
Mr Gribble took court action because he felt he was powerless to act against a group of teenagers who have been causing trouble at the school. Three weeks ago a pupil was threatened by some youths inside the school. That incident was not sufficiently serious to warrant police action and officers had advised that the school take a civil action. Mr Gribble said: "In the case of certain named individuals, they said that if we could get a court order preventing them from entering the grounds, they could be arrested if they did so."
But on Monday, as the school prepared for yesterday's hearing at Peterborough County Court, two youths burst into a classroom and attacked a 14-year- old pupil. Two youths, aged 15 and 16, have been charged, one with assault and the other with criminal damage.
Yesterday the school sought an injunction banning three named teenagers, including the two charged after Monday's incident, from the school but Judge Angus Macarthur ruled that any injunction he granted would not be enforceable.
He decided that the three, all former pupils at the school, could not be jailed because they were too young and could not be fined because they had no independent income. He said: "These injunctions would be toothless and should not be granted. I do not think it is appropriate for this court to make an order where there is a likelihood of a breach and in the case of a breach this court would have no powers to act."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments