Have we done our homework on the life of a teenager?
The world of the 13-year-old is more complex now than when Tony Blair sat down to his prep, writes Judith Judd
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tony Blair's decision to prescribe homework times adds another complication to the confusing world of the 13-year-old.
On the one hand, teenagers are under pressure to earn money to eke out family finances or to buy the latest pair of designer trainers.
On the other, they feel the need to work hard at school because jobs for 16-year-old school leavers are harder to come by than those for 18- year-olds, and most expect to stay on at school.
And, the fin de siecle distractions of drugs, earlier sexual activity and television and video make the lives of teenagers 30 years ago seem comparatively simple.
Yesterday, as a survey showed that one in four under-13s is working illegally, the furore continued over the Labour leader's intention to put recommended homework times in compulsory home-school contracts.
If teenagers are into designer jeans, the nation's leaders are into homework by design. Whichever party wins the next election, home preparation will be on the agenda.
Today the Government will release its own guidelines on homework. No times will be included but schools will be encouraged to copy the good practice of others.
Not to be outdone, the Prince of Wales yesterday congratulated Scotland on leading the way in providing out-of-hours study centres for inner-city pupils. The Prince's Trust aims to develop 1,000 such centres by 2000.
The ideas of both the Prince and the Government are more acceptable to teachers than those of Mr Blair. His efforts to impose homework times on schools face other problems besides the teenagers who are sitting behind the supermarket till when they should be grappling with Shakespeare.
Labour sources explained yesterday that the set times of 30 minutes' homework for primary pupils and an hour and a half for secondary would not themselves be legally enforceable. Schools would be free to decide what they put in their contracts but the Office for Standards in Education would ensure through its inspections that home preparation was included.
The aim is to raise the profile of homework. A recent survey by the National Foundation for Educational Research found that 43 per cent of primary pupils received no regular work to take home.
Teachers support the end but are scathing about the means. David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, which strongly supports home-school contracts, said: "Labour needs to understand that we need more prescription like a hole in the head.
"It isn't sensible to try to prescribe even by means of inspection what should or should not be in a home-school contract."
Nigel de Gruchy, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, said: "Legislation will do nothing to solve the biggest problems which are television, videos and parents who aren't interested in homework."
Most research evidence shows that carefully set and marked homework improves standards. American studies have shown that children who do regularly marked homework do better than those who do not.
Yet Italian children who do more homework than British children do worse in international tests while Finns, who do less, score better.
Inspectors emphasise that it is the quality of homework that counts. If the political initiatives mean ever-growing quantities of boring homework, they will fail to woo teenagers from their paper rounds.
John Coleman, director of the Trust for the Study of Adolescence, said: "I'm not someone who looks back to a golden age but we do have hard evidence that there are more pressures on today's teenagers. They become sexually active earlier, there is more youth unemployment, more are living with single parents and the gap between those with plenty of money and those with little has widened."
Leading article & Letters, page 11
What they're saying on the classroom floor
The journalists at Children's Express, the press agency gave a full range of responses to Tony Blair's initiative on homework - and hope he will do more of his own if the Labour Party wins the next general election.
Nine-year-old Anton Yavorsky, a year five pupil at St Mary of the Angels primary school in Notting Hill, west London, says it is hard to judge who would benefit from 30 minutes of homework a night. "Some people take longer to do the same work. I got homework, but not every night - it usually takes about 15 to 20 minutes. Mostly it's spelling and maths," he said. "Maybe I'll wish we had more homework when I go to secondary school."
Increasing homework at primary school was seen as a good idea by the secondary school pupils who were interviewed. Tara Glynn, 17, from Hackney, east London, said: "I never did homework in primary school until the last year. When I started secondary school it was part of growing up and gaining responsibility."
Tara, who is in her final year of A- Levels at Our Lady's Convent School, in Stamford Hill, east London, says homework varies from day to day even at her level. "Homework depends on what happened that day at school. I don't think I agree with the idea of parent-teacher contracts because the children will only get resentful."
Senab Adekunie, 14, is in year 9 at Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Secondary School, in Tony Blair's Islington constituency. She does the homework her teacher assigns and extra work where possible. "Not everyone has a stable environment at home. Homework centres would show that there is support for you and that adults think your studies matter."
Twelve-year-old Juanita Rosenoir said: "In my school they sometimes overdo the homework and I don't get to bed until 10pm." Juanita, a pupil at Greycoats Hospital Lower School in Sloane Square, west London, added: "It's not fair to say that you should do a certain amount because they don't know how all the pupils can cope."
Gillian Antwi-Bosiako, 10, a pupil at St Francis primary School, in Peckham, south London, gave a novel response. "I do my homework because I'm usually bored at home," she said. "I get one piece of homework at night which takes me about 15 minutes. It's not enough and is too easy most of the time. I think I will find it harder at secondary school because it is too easy now."
Gillian says Blair's promise of 30 pupils per primary school class does not go far enough. She currently has 25 classmates. "There should only be 15 in a class. With 26 it's really crowded and there are more people who ruin your learning when they are mucking about."
n Express is a programme of learning through jornalism for children aged eight to 18. A charity, it provides a news service that promotes the views and investigations of the young.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments