Grammar school plans dropped
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers have backed away from plans to push through the introduction of new grammar schools, government officials admitted last night.
A leaked draft of the contents of a Bill to be published later this month shows that proposals to force discussions about full-scale selection wherever a new school is built have been dropped.
Gillian Shephard, the Secretary of State for Education, will also have the right to step in and prevent schools from selecting a proportion of their pupils if it would leave some children without places.
Last night, Labour accused Mrs Shephard of taking a "two-faced" approach, telling her party's conference that she was pressing on with plans for more grammar schools while quietly allowing her officials to water them down.
A spokesman for the Department for Education and Employment said officials would consult local communities on what kinds of school they wanted.
"They will have to consider what's best in their view for the area ... Where the supply of school places is tight, selection could mean there would be some pupils who couldn't find a school place," he said.
A White Paper published in June said the agency which funds opted-out schools would be required to consider building grant-maintained grammar schools wherever extra places were needed. However, the measure is not mentioned in provisional proposals for the new Bill, which have been passed to The Independent.
The provisional proposals do say, however, that all schools must consider the case for introducing selection every year, and that would-be grammar schools will have the "right of appeal" if their local authorities try to block them.
Mrs Shephard told delegates at her party's Bournemouth conference on Thursday that the government wanted to encourage more grammar schools "in response to parental demand".
But, last night, a teachers' union leader said surveys showed that most parents did not want more grammar schools.
Peter Smith, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said ministers had clearly realised that plans for a grammar school in every town would not be popular. "Parents won't be keen on it," he said. "It is a very low priority."
David Blunkett, Labour's education spokesman, said: "Gillian Shephard would appear to have been taking a two-faced approach. While assuring the Prime Minister that his plans for a grammar school in every town will be delivered, she has quietly got her officials to drop one of the key ways in which the Tories imagined that this might by delivered," he said.
A spokesman for the Funding Agency for Schools said it had asked parents for their views on selection when consulting on a new school in Epsom and Ewell, Surrey. It had been told emphatically that they were not interested.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments