Giant sea gates can save Venice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EXPERTS FROM the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say the only way to save Venice from high tides are giant flood gates.
Engineers proposed putting barriers 30m (98ft) tall on the seabed at three entrances to the lagoon. The barriers would only be raised during flooding, about a dozen times a year.
Experts believe the level of the Adriatic will rise 30cm (12ins) over the next 100 years, which means the frequency of high tides will be "catastrophic" without the barriers.
The government last month rejected the plan, called Project Moses, saying it might turn the Venetian lagoon into a stagnant pool, cut off from the Adriatic. The MIT team was retained to assess its environmental impact. But it endorsed the plan and said construction should start quickly. The pounds 1.4bn project would take 10 years.
The experts said the gates would actually increase circulation in the lagoon and improve water quality. The Environment Ministry has no alternative proposal.
MIT members said conclusions of the Italian Environment Ministry panel that rejected Project Moses were "untenable and supported by no scientific evidence". (AP)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments