Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

French in court for bird hunting

John Lichfield
Wednesday 02 December 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE EUROPEAN Commission decided yesterday to take France to the European Court for failing to protect migratory birds. It is prosecuting France on two counts of breaching a 1979 directive imposing Europe-wide restrictions on the hunting of birds which migrate across national boundaries.

It follows a decision by the French parliament to allow hunters to shoot duck, geese, woodcock and snipe for an extra six weeks in summer and an extra month in spring. The law, not yet implemented, would allow French hunters to continue to shoot the protected birds during their autumn and spring migrations.

Paris was already in trouble for failing to implement the directive properly. It was condemned by the European Court of Justice in 1994.

On the second count, Paris is accused of failing to implement laws banning the shooting of four kinds of seabird regarded as endangered. EU countries can seek an exemption if the birds - three kinds of gull and one type of cormorant - can be proved to be a nuisance but France did not go through these procedures. If the French government is found guilty, it faces fines of up to pounds 10,000 a day on each charge.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in