Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

French court to decide Shayler fate

John Lichfield
Wednesday 21 October 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A FRENCH court will decide next month whether the renegade MI5 officer, David Shayler, is a "political" criminal who has the right to remain indefinitely in France, or whether he must return to Britain to face prosecution under the Official Secrets Act.

The Shayler case, which has already re-opened the debate on the Act in Britain, may also become a cause celebre in French and European, law.

At his 90-minute extradition hearing in Paris yesterday, both the French state and Mr Shayler's lawyers argued that the decision on whether to return him to Britain could have an important impact on future, judicial relations between EU countries.

In effect, the Chambre d'Accusations must decide in the the next four weeks whether Mr Shayler committed a "political" crime and whether the concept of "political crime" still exists between EU nations.

Mr Shayler, in a brief statement to the court, said: "The only thing I have ever done ... is to criticise the (British) state."

He said his motive in leaking MI5 secrets to the press was to expose the shortcomings of the British security services. He denied an accusation from the French public prosecutor that he had sold the information simply to make money.

He had accepted pounds 20,000 from the Mail on Sunday, he said, because he knew he would have to flee abroad and would need cash to survive. He had since offered to return the money.

Mr Shayler, 32, a junior officer in MI5 for four years, was arrested in Paris in August at the request of the British police. He is charged with a breach of the Official Secrets' Act after leaking 30 top secret documents which were the basis of a Mail on Sunday article on bungling, incompetence and persistent drunkenness in MI5.

Mr Shayler repeated his allegation yesterday that he was arrested to prevent him leaking further, embarrassing information about a failed British plot to assassinate the Libyan leader, Colonel Gaddafi - a failure which led, he said, to the deaths of "innocent civilians".

It was Mr Shayler's first public appearance since his arrest. He had shaved off his goatee beard and looked pale and thinner after nearly three months in the Sante prison in Paris.

France does not extradite people for "political crimes", but a 1996 European convention committed EU countries to abolish the concept of "political" crime. France's constitutional council ruled that this treaty infringed a "fundamental principle" of French law and could not be ratified.

Mr Shayler's lawyer, Maitre William Bourdon, argued that the British police had admitted that no vital state or defence secret had been threatened. By negotiating a possible deal or amnesty with Shayler, in effect they admitted that his case was a political, not a criminal one.

Tony Blair is expected to appoint a Whitehall "spywatcher" to reinforce its checks on Britain's secret and intelligence services - MI5, MI6 and GCHQ - following warnings by the cross-party Intelligence and Security committee that their powers needed strengthening, writes Our Chief Political Correspondent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in