Georgia made it easier for parents to challenge school library books. Almost no one has done so
Georgia Republican lawmakers passed a law to make it easier to challenge school library books as inappropriate, but few people are using it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Allison Strickland urged a suburban Atlanta school board in June to remove four books from school libraries, she was following a path cleared by Georgiaās Republican lawmakers.
But after the bitterly debated Georgia law took effect Jan. 1, The Associated Press found few book challengers are using it.
One key element restraining complaints: The law only allows parents of current students to challenge books.
Although not new, book challenges have surged since 2020, part of a backlash to what kids read and discuss in public schools. Conservatives want to stop children from reading books with themes on sexuality, gender, race and religion that they find objectionable. PEN America, a group promoting freedom of expression, counted 4,000 instances of books banned nationwide from July 2021 to December 2022.
But while fights are ongoing in Forsyth County, where Strickland was protesting, at least 15 other large Georgia districts surveyed by AP said they have received no demands to remove books under the law.
Georgia conservatives last year aimed to ease book challenges. But lawmakers knew a parents-only restriction would also limit them.
āWe are not going to turn this bill into a weapon for every taxpayer to harass the school system,ā said state Rep. James Burchett, a Republican from Waycross, during a 2022 hearing.
Still, some books are disappearing. Kasey Meehan, PEN Americaās Freedom to Read director, said some schools are removing books even before parents ask. Thatās happened in Forsyth County, where documents obtained by AP show a librarian āweededā two books Strickland was protesting from another high schoolās library, just before they were challenged there.
Those who object to books say Georgiaās law is being interpreted too narrowly and removing books should be easier. In most states anyone can challenge a book, not just parents, Meehan said. But some districts elsewhere also limit protests over books to parents.
The Georgia law may be preventing widespread challenges by a handful of conservative activists. Research has found complaints nationwide are largely driven by just a few people ā who sometimes arenāt parents.
Forsyth County, a fast-growing suburb with 54,000 students, has been a hotbed for conservative agitation over public education.
A parent of two West Forsyth High School students, Strickland complained in March about sexually explicit books, attaching excerpts from BookLooks. The conservative website highlights passages that its writers consider objectionable. Strickland was working with the Mama Bears, a group recruiting book challengers.
Strickland targeted four novels: āDime,ā by E.R. Frank, in which a girl is lured into prostitution; āTilt,ā by Ellen Hopkins, in which a 17-year-old girl gets pregnant and a 16-year-old boy falls in love with an HIV-positive boy; āPerfect,ā another Hopkins book about teens facing unrealistic expectations; and āOryx and Crake,ā by Margaret Atwood, about a plague that kills most humans.
The principal examined the books, as legally required. In April, a Forsyth principal sided with a complaint, removing āThe Nerdy and the Dirtyā by B.T. Gottfred. But the West Forsyth principal concluded the books Strickland targeted should remain on shelves. She appealed to the school board.
āThere is not one educational thing to be had from any of these books,ā Strickland told board members, saying the books ārun the gamut of child prostitution, forced rape, pedophilia, bestiality, sodomy, drug and alcohol abuse, all of very young minor children, often with adult partners.ā
Others dissented, including T.J. McKinney, a departing teacher at a Forsyth middle school. She said students need to see their struggles reflected in books, and itās pointless to shield older students from vulgarity or sex.
āThe book is not introducing kids to sex. If youāre in high school, theyāre having sex,ā McKinney said. āThey are not learning this from books.ā
Forsyth Superintendent Jeff Bearden supported the principalās recommendation to keep the books, as he did twice earlier. But the law requires the board to decide.
In April, board members backed administrators, retaining āEndlessly Ever After,ā a choose-your-own-adventure fairy tale. But in May, the board overruled Bearden and required advance parental consent before students could read Gottfredās āThe Handsome Girl & Her Beautiful Boy.ā
Faced with Stricklandās challenges in June, board members also required parental approval for the four books. The compromise left many unhappy.
āMembers of the board, I ask you, are you really going to compromise on child pedophilia?ā asked Mama Bears leader Cindy Martin before the vote. āIf the answer is yes, then what will you compromise on next?ā
āI see it as a loss,ā McKinney said after the meeting. āThe students still donāt have a right to choose their own books.ā
Forsyth County was once a rural locale where white mobs terrorized the Black minority into fleeing in 1912. But suburban growth made it well-educated, affluent and diverse. Only 47% of Forsyth students were white and non-Hispanic last year.
But itās also heavily Republican, and crowds attacked the systemās diversity, equity and inclusion plan in 2021. Agitation bled over into book protests. Officials pulled eight books from libraries in early 2022. They would later return all except āAll Boys Arenāt Blue,ā George M. Johnsonās memoir of growing up queer.
Opponents organized against the bans. High school student Shivi Mehta said she wants libraries to āstay whole.ā
āI donāt want to have some books locked away,ā Mehta said. āI donāt want to have books that I canāt read or canāt have access to because a group of politicians said I couldnāt.ā
Critics continued reading explicit book excerpts at board meetings, urging removal. After telling a Mama Bears member to stop, the board banned her from speaking at meetings. The Mama Bears sued, and in November, a federal judge ruled the policy unconstitutionally restricted free speech. The district paid $107,000 in lawyerās fees.
Others complained to the U.S. Department of Education that the district was excluding stories about people not white or straight. In a May warning, the department agreed, saying Forsyth schools may have created a hostile environment violating federal laws against race and sex discrimination, āleading to increased fears and possibly harassmentā among students.
The district settled the complaint, agreeing to explain the book removal process, offer āsupportive measuresā and survey students about the issue.
But while federal government concerns may restrain administrators, the fight isnāt over.
āI think the momentum to ban or restrict books is not going away anytime soon,ā Mehta said.
____
The Associated Press education team receives support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The AP is solely responsible for all content.