Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former Tory ministers linked to wasted 63m pounds: Government accused of misleading Parliament over Wessex health authority's computer contracts

Tim Kelsey,Colin Brown
Tuesday 04 May 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEW EVIDENCE that the Government misled Parliament over computer contracts awarded by Wessex Regional Health Authority emerged yesterday amid a growing political row about a report to MPs linking former Tory cabinet ministers to the waste of pounds 63m.

The district auditor's report could be highly damaging for the Tory party on the eve of the local elections and the Newbury by-election.

Labour members of the cross-party Commons Public Accounts Committee, which meets today to consider the Wessex affair, were angry when they found it stamped 'confidential'.

The Independent and Computer Weekly, in a joint investigation earlier this year, revealed the existence of two confidential reports by the district auditor which castigated Wessex and its present chairman, Sir Robin Buchanan, for grossly mismanaging a regional computerisation scheme between 1982 and 1991. It also questioned the role of Lord Jenkin, a former Tory cabinet minister, in lobbying for one contract.

Additional documents leaked to the Independent yesterday, but not made available officially to PAC members, reveal that three Tory cabinet ministers ignored warnings by internal Department of Health auditors.

In a report dated 9 February 1987 which was submitted in confidence to the Conservative Party Chairman, Sir Norman Fowler, then Secretary of State for Social Services, auditors expressed serious reservations about the award of a computer contract, worth an initial pounds 7m, to Arthur Andersen & Co.

The report questions the contract's legality and the circumstances of the tender itself. The auditor describes how Arthur Andersen was allowed 'access to evaluation data' denied to others tendering. Consultants employed by Wessex, who advised against Andersen, cost the authority pounds 130,000, the report adds.

A month before getting the report, Sir Norman wrote to Ann Clwyd, Labour MP for Cynon Valley: 'If you know, or have heard, of any supposed irregularities that I do not know about, I would be obliged if you would let me know what they are so that I can investigate them thoroughly.'

However, three months after receiving the report, on 15 May 1987, Tony Newton, then Minister for Health, answering a question on behalf of the Secretary of State, assured MPs that the computer contract which Andersen's won conformed to EC/General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade arrangements. According to the secret report, that was far from the reality.

A second internal report to the Secretary of State warned that costs were escalating on the computer project, and that there was evidence of overcharging, and duplicate payments.

Kenneth Clarke, while Secretary of State, ignored warnings about contract irregularities in a report dated 2 November 1988. William Waldegrave, the next Secretary of State, also received a report critical of the authority.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in