Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former patients in test for hepatitis

John McKie
Sunday 24 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Twenty-seven patients have been recalled to hospital for blood tests after being operated on by a doctor carrying the hepatitis B virus. The patients, from the West Midlands, had surgery between November and January. The Queen Elizabeth hospital in Birmingham has called all 27 back for tests.

Hospital officials last night played down the risks to patients called back as "minimal". No other patients are involved.

The doctor, who was a junior surgeon on a three-month contract, has been banned from doing any more operations. At the end of his contract, he underwent routine screening and was given a positive diagnosis for hepatitis B, which is transmitted through infected blood and can remain in the system for years.

Jonathan Michael, medical director of the trust running the hospital, said: "The doctor had previously received a hepatitis vaccination and he is therefore unlikely to have known he was a carrier ... the likelihood of any patient having been infected is minimal.

"The risk is almost negligible and we would encourage patients not to worry. If any patient is subsequently shown to have been infected we will immediately provide appropriate treatment."

If any patient is affected, the hospital is likely to face a sizeable compensation claim.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in