Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Footballers to face retrial

Michael Streeter
Thursday 06 March 1997 19:02 EST
0Comments

The footballers Bruce Grobbelaar, John Fashanu and Hans Segers are to be re-tried on charges that they corruptly conspired to fix Premier League football matches for a Far Eastern syndicate, the Crown Prosecution Service confirmed yesterday.

On Tuesday a jury at Winchester Crown Court failed to reach a verdict on any of the charges against the trio and the fourth defendant, Heng Suan Lim, a Malaysian businessman, after nearly 11 hours of deliberation.

The Crown Prosecution Service, which had announced its intention to seek a re-trial immediately after the first jury was discharged, said the decision had been taken in consultation with law officers. Sir Nicholas Lyell, the Attorney-General, was among those consulted over whether a further trial was in the public interest.

A date has still to be set for the new trial, which will be on the same charges as the four faced in the seven-week case at Winchester. The first, against Mr Lim, Mr Fashanu, 34, the former Aston Villa and Wimbledon striker, and the ex-Wimbledon goalkeeper Mr Segers, 35, alleges that between 1 February 1991 and 9 November 1994, they conspired to give and corruptly accept gifts of money to influence or attempt to influence the outcome of football matches.

A second count, against Mr Lim, Mr Fashanu and Mr Grobbelaar, the ex- Liverpool and Southampton goalkeeper, alleges a conspiracy in similar terms between 1 November 1992 and 9 November 1994.

Mr Grobbelaar faces a separate charge that he corruptly accepted pounds 2,000 from Christopher Vincent for improperly influencing or attempting to influence the outcome of a football match or matches.

All the defendants maintain their innocence.

Mr Grobbelaar's solicitor, David Hewitt, said: "We are extremely disappointed by the decision ... to pursue this case after a trial lasting seven weeks failed to produce a single verdict ... We cannot believe that it is in the public interest to continue."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

0Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in