Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Foot sues Murdoch over spy `smear'

Rhys Williams
Friday 24 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BY RHYS WILLIAMS

Media Correspondent

Michael Foot is to sue Rupert Murdoch over an article in last weekend's Sunday Times alleging that he was a KGB spy, a charge that he says amounted to a "McCarthyite smear".

Although Times Group Newspapers and News Group Newspapers, publishers of the Sunday Times and News of the World respectively, were also named in the libel proceedings, the former Labour leader's solicitor, David Price, said yesterday that Mr Foot held the newspaper tycoon "personally responsible" for the article.

Mr Price said that during Mr Foot's long career as a politician and journalist he had suffered "a good many unjust or untrue statements in the media" without complaint. However, he added: "These allegations accuse him of treachery to his country and have been made even though the Sunday Times had every reason to believe that they were untrue.

"Because of the gravity of these lies, Mr Foot has decided to bring Rupert Murdoch before the jury. He holds Mr Murdoch personally responsible for this McCarthyite smear which was published as front page news."

Under the headline "KGB: Michael Foot was our agent", the Sunday Times alleged that the KGB regarded Mr Foot as an "agent of influence" during the Sixties and that it had made a number of cash payments to the left- wing journal Tribune while he was editor.

Mr Foot, who reportedly operated under the codename "Boot", immediately dismissed the story as "a big lie", adding: "As far as I know I have never met or seen a KGB agent in my life." On Sunday, John Witherow, editor of the Sunday Times, admitted to BBC radio that the allegation that Mr Foot was an agent might be "utter rubbish". The paper, he said, was merely suggesting that the KGB believed he was an agent. In a statement last night, Mr Witherow repeated that assertion, saying the paper would "vigorously defend the libel action".

Mikhail Lyubimov, a former KGB officer quoted in the article, told the Independent in Moscow this week: "The idea that Foot was any kind of agent is a ridiculous smear." A second, Viktor Kubeykin, who was said by the paper to have seen a KGB file marked "Boot" and confirmed that the organisation considered him an "agent of influence", added: "They wrote the exact opposite of what I said. This is a 100 per cent distortion."

The original allegations about Mr Foot and several trade unionists were contained in a manuscript of the Soviet defector Oleg Gordievsky's memoirs, bought by the Sunday Times last September for serialisation. Mr Gordievsky's publishers, Macmillan, were reluctant to risk naming Mr Foot without any supporting evidence. Mr Witherow agreed, and dispatched a reporter to Moscow, where interviews were conducted with several KGB officers, including Mr Lyubimov and Mr Kubeykin.

William Armstrong, non-fiction publisher at Macmillan, said that the book, which comes out next month, would be "very close to what the Sunday Times wrote",but changes may be necessary.

Mr Foot said last night: "I don't like taking libel action, but I thought they would keep repeating it ad nauseam."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in