Firefighters held liable for blunder
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The rescue services are not immune from being sued for negligence, the Court of Appeal decided yesterday in a ruling which could cost local authorities millions of pounds.
The appeal was brought by Hampshire County Council which paid pounds 16m compensation to Digital Equipment Limited at Basingstoke for a serious blunder by the county fire brigade. Called to a fire at the company's headquarters, firefighters turned off the sprinkler system and the building burned down.
The council appealed against the compensation, arguing that firefighters, like police, were always immune from negligence claims. But Lord Justice Stuart-Smith, sitting with Lords Justices Potter and Judge, held that, although a fire brigade was not under any common-law duty to answer a call, it could be sued if, on arrival, firefighters created a danger or made the situation worse. The council is to seek leave to appeal to the House of Lords.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments