Fine prompts hospital safety purge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A nationwide crackdown on hospitals was launched yesterday after an NHS Trust was fined pounds 4,000 for breaching safety regulations.
It is the first time the Health and Safety Executive has brought a case that was not prompted by a specific accident and teams have now begun visiting 40 NHS trusts around the country. They have warned that more prosecutions could follow if rule breaches were found.
Swindon and Marlborough NHS Trust admitted a single charge of breaking health and safety rules before magistrates in Swindon, Wiltshire, in a two hour hearing yesterday.
The court heard that the trust had put staff and patients at risk through a "fundamental failure" to ensure proper safety systems were in place.
The case followed a routine inspection at the trust last September which found lapses in policy and training in manual handling, the biggest single cause of hospital accidents, as well as inadequate ventilation for a hospital mortuary handling 850 post mortems a year.
The court was told the trust was guilty of a "fundamental failure" to ensure that adequate systems were in place and enforced. David Pokora, chairman of the trust, was told this had "placed undue risk, in particular on members of staff and also for patients and members of the public".
The inspection also found that the trust had no system to clearly separate clinical waste - including used syringes and dressings - from other rubbish.
Mr Pokora claimed that the difficulties had arisen from an inherited backlog of maintenance work costing pounds 40 million.
However, the King's Fund - an independent healthcare charity, said it was "not surprised" that the trust was prosecuted. Gordon Mitchell, its spokesman, said: "Often we find they have adequate systems in place ... but these are not followed up."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments