Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Film director fights blasphemy ban

Ros Wynne-Jones
Wednesday 27 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The author Salman Rushdie yesterday defended Nigel Wingrove's right to freedom of expression as the film director began his fight against Britain's blasphemy law in the European Court of Human Rights.

In a written submission Mr Rushdie, who successfully defended his novel The Satanic Verses against charges of blasphemy before a British court in 1989, said: "Freedom of religious belief is as important a concept as freedom of speech ... But while it is surely proper that our laws should protect people's right to believe in whatever they may choose, it is just as surely wrong to privilege the beliefs ... by protecting them against dissent, satire and disbelief."

Geoffrey Robertson QC argued for Mr Wingrove that banning his film Visions of Ecstasy, about St Teresa of Avila's visions of Christ, breached his freedom of expression guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights. The film was refused a certificate by the British Board of Film Classification.

A judgment is expected in the summer.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in