Filing 'weaknesses' blamed as export licence forms found
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More official documents relating to BMARC, the company which sent arms to Iran and once counted Jonathan Aitken MP among its directors, have turned up - after earlier government searches appeared to suggest they had all been found.
Phillip Oppenheim, a junior trade minister, admitted yesterday that there were a further 43 export licence applications than had been thought. Another five applications had been found but the documents were missing. In a Parliamentary answer to David Nicholson, Conservative MP for Taunton, Mr Oppenheim blamed "weaknesses" in the indexing systems for the new material not being found until now.
BMARC is the subject of two inquiries, one by Customs and Excise and the other by the Commons Trade and Industry Select Committee, into its trade with Iran. They were set up after the Independent revealed, and Michael Heseltine, the then President of the Board of Trade, admitted in the Commons last June, that it was supplying arms to Iran. The company avoided export controls by sending the weapons - 140 naval guns - via Singapore.
Officially, during the period of the Iran-Iraq war, Britain joined a United Nations embargo, banning the sale of weapons to either side. Government guidelines issued in 1984 stated: "We should not in future approve orders for any defence equipment which in our view would significantly enhance the capability of either side to prolong or exacerbate the conflict." That was changed in 1988 to: "We should not approve orders in future for any defence equipment which in our view would be of direct and significant assistance to either country in the conduct of offensive operations."
The guidelines were backed by legislation - the Export Control Act. Several directors, including Mr Aitken, have denied knowing Iran was the ultimate destination while others, led by Gerald James, the former chairman, have claimed all the directors knew. One of the difficulties facing the committee has been the trickle of official documentary material.
Early in its investigation, officials admitted they had been unable to secure papers seized from Mr James and other directors by Ministry of Defence police. Mr Oppenheim said that following the discovery of the "weaknesses" in the filing system towards the end of last year, "a wider search was then put in hand" which "led to the discovery of an additional batch of applications". This brought the total of BMARC licence applications now uncovered for the period 1985 to 1990, to 880.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments