Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Field trailblazes his radical pension plan

John Rentoul
Tuesday 15 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A blueprint for "thinking the unthinkable" about the Welfare State was unveiled yesterday by Frank Field, the Labour MP regarded as a trailblazer for Tony Blair. The plans from Mr Field, chairman of the all-party social security select committee, had been eagerly awaited as evidence of the possible shape of a radical overhaul under Labour.

A representative for Harriet Harman, Labour's social security spokeswoman, welcomed theproposals for "stakeholder pensions", which aim to give people a fund of their own on top of the basic state pension. But the net effect of the plans is remarkably similar to "old Labour" policies to raise taxes and redistribute resources from rich to poor.

Figures produced by the Government Actuary for Mr Field show that those earning less than about pounds 15,000 a year would gain in their pay packet and in future pension rights, while those above that level would pay more. In all, taxes and compulsory contributions would rise by pounds 3bn a year.

The most striking proposal is to close down the state earnings related pension scheme (Serps); from 2000 all employees would be required to contribute to their own pension. The plans would be funded by a cut in the starting rate of income tax to 5p in the pound, with the standard rate cut from 24p to 19p, offset by national insurance contributions. In addition, those earning more than pounds 100 a week would make compulsory contributions to a second pension.

The Labour leader is known to admire Mr Field, and to have been disappointed with Chris Smith, who he charged with "thinking the unthinkable" as social security spokesman. But Mr Field's plans are likely to be unacceptable to either Mr Blair or Gordon Brown, the shadow Chancellor, who both thought Labour's plans to increase income tax at the last election were a vote- loser.

8 How to Pay for the Future; ICS, 18 Victoria Park Square, London E2 9PF; pounds 40 institutions or pounds 10

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in