Female managers `must be ruthless' to be successful
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BUSINESS SCHOOLS that urge "managers for the new millennium" to make contact with their feminine side have got it all wrong, the British Psy- chological Society was told yesterday.
Senior executives of both sexes need to exhibit macho "kick-ass" characteristics to be successful, it was found in a study of 1,200 managers.
Tuvia Melamid, of Capita RAS, a recruitment consultancy, said the top female executives were quite as "masculine" as their male colleagues. "One senior female manger told me that you have to be more like a man than a man and that you have to walk on dead bodies to get to the top," Dr Melamid told the annual occupational psychology conference of the British Psychological Society, meeting in Blackpool.
It was well-established that there was a clear-cut difference between male and female behaviour in the general population, Dr Melamid said: women were generally more caring and sensitive and men were tough-minded. However, there was very little difference between male and female managers, he found.
While there was some evidence that many women were breaking through the "glass ceiling" and becoming managers, the trend had made little difference to the way executives behaved.
"It's politically correct to suggest that managers should be more caring and sharing and that they should listen to what people say and take it into account, but it doesn't seem to work," he told the seminar.
Over five years Dr Melamid interviewed managers in a wide range of organisations in the public and private sector -- from education to the oil industry - and "macho" managerial qualities were seen to be needed in all of them.
His interviewees ranged from middle managers to chief executives and a quarter of them were women. Most of the successful female managers were seen to exhibit "masculine" characteristics quite naturally. Many of them had no children.
Those women who tried to get to the top of the tree by suppressing feminine qualities and developing the "nasty" approach invariably suffered considerable stress, he said.
"Successful managers understood that they were not liked by their colleagues because they had to take tough decisions.
"And just as `feminine' women experience difficulties, there was also no point in being a 1990s `new man'."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments