Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Fears over EU art levy scheme

James Cusick
Wednesday 10 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The sale of major works by great masters of 20th-century painting will cease in London if a sales levy intended to benefit artists and their heirs is introduced, the chairman of Christie's warned last night.

Lord Hindlip was stepping up the London art market's campaign against two European Union taxes - the levy, or droit de suite, and extra VAT - which, it fears, will drive business to New York. "If these twin threats are not resolutely tackled ... London's position will be ... diminished to an unrecognisable degree," the Tory peer said as he initiated a debate on the taxes in the House of Lords.

Eleven EU states have legislation in place for a levy entitling artists or their heirs for 70 years to a share of proceeds each time works are sold. The European Commission wants to apply it at rates of 2 to 4 per cent to all resales.

So far Britain, Ireland and the Netherlands have resisted. Had the levy existed in the UK in 1996, the British Art Market Federation believes, it would have generated pounds 10m in royalties for EU artists. But perhaps not: the likelihood is that international buyers and sellers of 20th-century art would already have left for New York, where there is no levy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in