Euro-sceptics back call to curb court's powers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN RENTOUL
Political Correspondent
Most Conservative MPs want the Government to act to curb the power of the European Court of Justice, the supreme legal authority of the European Union, according to a Harris poll for the Independent.
The poll suggests that demands for reforms to the court set out by the right-winger John Redwood yesterday have the overwhelming backing of Tory MPs. Of the 68 Tory MPs interviewed, 58 agreed the court "currently exerts too much power on UK law". Most Labour MPs - 62 out of 80 - disagreed.
Mr Redwood, who challenged John Major for the Conservative Party leadership last year, set out the Tory Euro-sceptics' demands for the renegotiation of the Maastricht treaty, which begins next month.
Mr Redwood published a document at a Westminster news conference listing proposals for inclusion in the Government's promised White Paper setting out its position for the "Maastricht II" talks.
Top of the list is a demand that the Government seeks treaty amendments to trim the powers of the European Court - which has infuriated Tory MPs with judgments which appear to extend European law. The court's reputation has also been affected by decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, which is not an EU institution, such as that against the killing of IRA terrorists by the SAS in Gibraltar.
Mr Redwood proposes that the European Court of Justice should deliberate in public and that dissenting judgments should be published. More significantly, he says that a member state should be able to refer decisions of the court to the Council of Ministers - representatives of all 15 governments - if it believes the ruling "reinterprets" European law.
David Davis, a Foreign Office minister, has criticised the lack of a system of appeals against court rulings, and suggested a time limit on the retrospective effect of its decisions. A Foreign Office spokeswoman said yesterday that she could not anticipate the contents of the White Paper, but "we have been giving further thought to the issue of the court".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments