English Heritage warms to the V&A Boilerhouse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference."Extremely hideous" or a "watershed in public taste", the pounds 67m Boilerhouse extension planned for the Victoria & Albert Museum in London moved a big step nearer reality yesterday when it received the backing of English Heritage.
Daniel Libeskind's provocatively modern design now has the support of the two bodies whose opinions matter most - English Heritage, the government's statutory adviser, and the Royal Fine Art Commission, concerned primarily with architecture.
Slimmed down from the massive tile-covered structure unveiled last May, the futuristic building will break the monotony of Exhibition Road, South Kensington, and provide the V&A with additional galleries, an education centre and cafes.
"Ten years ago it would have been inconceivable that a design of this originality would be applauded as widely as Daniel Libeskind's design has been," said Sir Jocelyn Stevens, chairman of English Heritage, announcing the decision. "Perhaps we are witnessing a watershed in public taste when design quality of this kind is appreciated and greeted so enthusiastically."
Alan Borg, director of the V&A, said planning permission would probably be sought from Kensington and Chelsea council in the autumn.
But the extension, consisting of conflicting planes, has influential critics. Giles Worsley, editor of Perspectives On Architecture, called it "extremely hideous and inappropriate"- a charge rejected by Sir Jocelyn.
A survey by the museum, based on the original bulkier design, found public opinion divided. Of more than 1,000 people who commented during a six-week exhibition, 48 per cent said they were against the Libeskind Boilerhouse, 40 per cent were in favour and 11 per cent were in support, but with reservations.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments