Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EMI takes the drugs out of the Beatles era

History is rewritten as references to psychedelic influences removed from cover of pounds 100 video

David Lister,Arts News Editor
Monday 07 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DAVID LISTER,

Arts News Editor

A pounds 100 boxed set of The Beatles Anthology videos has had its sleeve notes censored to remove all mention of drugs, The Independent has learned. The eight-volume set, which runs for 10 hours - twice the length of the anthology series on television - went on sale yesterday.

Buyers will be unaware that the video sleeves have been censored by EMI, The Beatles' record company. A number of drug-related passages have been deleted including a quote by Ringo saying that "the grass was influential in a lot of our changes, especially with the writers". That reference, implying that Lennon and McCartney were helped in their composing by soft drugs, has been removed, along with a passage by the group's long serving press officer, Derek Taylor.

Mr Taylor had written about how The Beatles had their minds expanded by marijuana, and that two of their albums, Rubber Soul and Revolver, showed "the beneficial effects of herbal jazz cigarettes".

At Apple Corps yesterday The Beatles' management privately said they were stunned that EMI had chosen to censor remarks about drugs, particularly as the videos themselves contain unseen footage of The Beatles talking about drugs and the psychedelic era.

One senior Beatles' aide said: "It is pretty amazing that 30 years after the event businessmen are still taking fright at references to drugs. The videos contain numerous mentions of drugs, none of which has been edited out. George Harrison talks about how he and John Lennon were slipped LSD by their dentist and went into a lift where they thought a red light was a fire and emerged from the lift screaming."

The three surviving Beatles also reveal that they "smoked marijuana for breakfast" during the making of the 1965 film Help!. Last night a spokesman for Parlophone, the division of EMI which deals with The Beatles, said he did not wish to comment on the changes.

Paul McCartney gave the first critical view of the complete eight-video set. He said: "Seeing some of the stuff I've seen in the videos I think proves we were a good band. I don't have to say that with any arrogance now, because I'm looking back on it as if it was four other people. But we were bloody good."

The videos will be on sale individually too, but demand is likely to be heaviest for the complete package. At HMV in Liverpool 50 sets were sold in the first hour of business; and it is estimated that about 200,000 sets will be sold nationwide. Ironically this figure is likely to be beaten by a new video shortly to be released by Oasis, often referred to as the Nineties' answer to The Beatles.

Neither group, though, is likely to have the best-selling music video ever. The sale of the Riverdance video is estimated so far at pounds 2m.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in