Election '97: Cash-for-questions row Tory adopted in secret
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Brown, one of the Tory MPs at the centre of the cash-for- questions affair, was adopted as prospective candidate for Brigg and Cleethorpes at a hastily held secret meeting of the constituency association on Monday night. The meeting had been brought forward from Friday in order to avoid any publicity for Mr Brown who has not made any public appearance since the cash for questions controversy erupted again just before Easter.
In evidence to the Downey inquiry Mr Brown admitted that he accepted pounds 6,000 to lobby on behalf of a tobacco company in 1988 and 1989 to allow an oral tobacco product, Skoal Bandits, to be allowed into Britain, without it in the Register of Members' Interests. He also admitted not telling ministers about his backing from the firm, United States Tobacco. At Monday's meeting, he won over doubters by apologising for accepting the money and for not declaring it to the Inland Revenue until the payments became public knowledge in 1996.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments