Election '97: Best beer or bitter dregs?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Away with the eccentric Peter Snow and his silly swingometer. That bibulous old aristocrat of Westminster, the Marquis of Granby, has introduced the infinitely preferable beerometer.
The Marquis, a public house off Smith Square and within 300 yards of all the party headquarters, is enticing people to vote with their thirst.
Tony Bowler, the licensee, has placed three pumps on the bar emblazoned with the faces of the three main party leaders. Customers are invited to choose one of them.
The beer they draw is all gentlemen's luncheon bitter of a moderate 4- per-cent strength and is identical. The choice is made purely on political grounds.
The sales of each beer are charted on the beerometer on the pub wall, installed on Monday night.
Yesterday Tony Blair was comfortably in the lead with 100 pints, John Major second with an abstemious 20 pints and Paddy Ashdown third with 15.
Mr Bowler, interrogated on the poor showing of the Prime Minister, believes that officials at Conservative Central Office, the nearest party HQ, about 50 yards away, have been banned from his pub.
"I think it's because senior Conservatives thought they might give the selection strategy away after a few drinks."
Mr Bowler took the precaution of putting the beerometer beyond the reach of the tallest customers in order to ensure that they did not nudge up the indicator and artificially boost the showing of their favoured candidate.
There could be another explanation for the pre-eminent showing of Mr Blair - New Labour might have found a role for those ghastly beer-swilling union leaders.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments