Chalk Talk: GCSE reforms won't win Gove many friends in high places
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It doesn't really come under the heading of a good day to bury bad news. However, Education Secretary Michael Gove's spat with the exams regulator Ofqual over his planned GCSE reforms escaped the oxygen of too much publicity – emerging as it did on the day Chancellor George Osborne delivered his pre-budget statement.
It doesn't come under the heading for two reasons: (i) the Chancellor, in many people's eyes, was delivering enough bad news to sate even the hungriest news editor's thirst for a bad-news story and (ii) Mr Gove himself got into another spat with Graham Stuart, the influential chairman of the Commons Education Select Committee, when he refused to disclose what the row was about – saying it was a matter for Ofqual to publicise its misgivings over his plans for a new English Baccalaureate certificate in the core subjects.
That it duly did – in a letter to Mr Gove, Glenys Stacey, its chief executive, warned that his aims for the new qualification might not be "realistically achievable". She added that there were no "precedents" to suggest that a single type of qualification for all pupils could work.
The deadline for consultation over the planned reforms expired this week with a final-day flourish from a host of actors and celebrities signing up to a document by the National Union of Teachers criticising the proposals.
Film-maker Ken Loach wrote: "It is sad and short-sighted that creative subjects are to be excluded from Baccalaureate. Many students find confidence and fulfilment in music, art or drama. Other work is then supported and enriched."
It will be fascinating to hear the Government's response to it now the watchdog it appointed has also expressed its reservations.
Meanwhile, back at the Sutton Trust, the education charity that campaigns for disadvantaged students has doubled the number of places it is offering at university summer schools in the United States next year. In all, 150 will be available at Yale and Massachusetts Institute of Technology for bright UK teenagers from low- or middle-income homes in 2013.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments