Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: Hidden treasures

Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The new funding allocations for universities following the 2008 research assessment exercise are depressing news for some highly rated institutions, most notably for Cambridge and for Imperial College London, the UK's powerhouse of science and technology. Although very superior, Imperial's high reputation for research was inconsistent across all of its departments, with notable blemishes in some areas of medicine. Research funding was also cut for the London School of Economics, but in its case, it was a victim of the decision to protect investment in science and technology.

So, we have been witnessing a redistribution of funding. This was to be expected following the new RAE rankings last December, which used a different methodology that rewarded islands of excellence in a much wider range of institutions. Thus Coventry University's research money almost doubled, and Lincoln's increased more than six times. The Higher Education Funding Council was right to find a new way of measuring quality. The old one – based on an average in different areas – concealed mediocre research. The new one uncovers some real gems.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in